Bombs and depth charges at sea
(2_15)
The theme
Review
While considering naval forces in action, one would primarily think of
naval surface vessels fighting with each other with roaring canons in a
sea battle with thousands of fountains of water springing up from the
sea due to impact of shells hitting the sea surface, and of battleships
opting to sink heroically in the rough seas along with their commanding
admirals and soldiers. Even a layperson now knows that war at sea had
already shown many other dimensions in the previous century itself.
However, the general image of a sea battle demonstrates that fighting
at sea can disturb water layer of quite a large sea area, e.g. Battle
of Jutland (Skagerrak) in May 1916. 250 naval vessels gathered there
and operated in an area of about 2,500 square miles. But neither WWI,
nor WWII saw many such events. Warfare at sea came to rely more on sea
mines, submarines and counter measures to meet the goals, i.e., sinking
of ships. Concerning WWI: 5_13 and 5_14.
Means of warfare increased
With the start of WWII navies had a fairly new means at hand, i.e.
aerial bombing of floating or submerged vessels and use of depth
charges to hit submarines. Like the impact of sea mines, bombs and
depth charges have a considerable impact on the status of seawater in
affected areas. Further, one should not ignore the third
activity, i.e. shooting and shelling of fighter planes or bombers with
all the firepower, coastal batteries, and vessels with guns had in
their possession, as a preventive measure against being attacked or
bombed. In the course of a war at sea, millions and millions of
ammunition, ranging from small to big calibre, would inevitably hit the
sea.
Compared with the potential abovementioned two means of
bombing/shelling had developed during the war, their deployment at
start of war in 1939 was more restrained. Parties to war were not very
well prepared for using airplanes in naval warfare and depth charges to
fight submarines when war commenced. While Britain managed to set up an
effective ‘Royal Air Force Coastal Command’ to go for the
German
U-boats and to undermine German merchant shipping in North-West
European waters fairly soon after the war had started (Lit.:
Goulter)[1], Germans never managed
to create an effective aerial wing
for their navy. Existing German naval air force was small, poorly
equipped and remained insignificant. German Navy therefore had to
depend on the Luftwaffe and its Chief, Hermann Goering, who zealously
exercised his command over all Luftwaffe units that might be compelled
to support naval operations (Lit.: Goulter, p.37)[2]. Even though air
forces of both warring parties were active from the first day of war,
they did not play any major role in naval warfare in 1939. Such being
the case, one might wonder how much this section of war machinery
actively or passively contributed in ‘stirring’ the seas
during the
autumn season of 1939. Similar uncertainties existed with regard to the
number of depth charges used and their locations. However, one thing
became already very clear during the initial few months of war.
Military forces had grown tremendously since last major war, viz. WWI,
as if a breeze had developed into a hurricane.
As it is common knowledge, there exists a mixed layer of water at the
surface of the seas, from a few meters up to a maximum of hundred
meters depth, which is stirred by surface winds, However, military
activities can turn huge sea areas into mixed layers quicker than winds.
Presentation
Impact caused to seas in a sea battle with bombardments by airplanes
and firing by battle ships and coastal batteries can only be imagined.
How many bombs and shells ‘stirred’ the sea? How much
explosives blew
up? How many missions were carried out? None of the above questions can
be answered here in detail, as such information is rarely available.
The first four months of war can be regarded as a mere ‘military
warming up’ phase. It certainly was, as far as aerial warfare is
concerned, even though aviation had made considerable developments
since WWI.
The question remains as to what restraints or precautions should have
been observed by participants in the war in order not to drive the
winter weather into arctic condition? The answer is left to
everyone’s
own judgement.
Bombing at Sea
Bomber planes usually could carry up to two tonnes of
ammunition, which
means that on each mission they carried with them bombs in
denominations of: either twenty numbers of 50 kg each, or eight
numbers of 250 kg each or four numbers of 500 kg each (Lit.:
Schmidt)[3]. A small anti-aircraft
gun of 2 cm could fire about 200
shots per minute. Guns and munitions of upto 20 cm could go on
larger naval vessels. During the first two months of war, German pilots
were ordered to attack only warships, but the order was soon enlarged
to include merchant ships as well. The ‘Loewengeschwader’
of the
Luftwaffe soon claimed to have attacked more than 200 war and merchant
ships, sinking 46 of them with a tonnage of 70,000 and
severely damaging 76 ships with a tonnage of 300.000 (Lit.: Schmidt).
Veracity of this claim cannot either be confirmed or refuted here. But
as the British Admiralty admitted in December 1939, German planes had
attacked 35 of its vessels within a period of three days, sinking 7
ships (NYT, 21 December 1939). Total number of bomber attacks against
naval and merchant vessels, ports and near coastal installations might
amount to many hundreds over the first 3-4 months of war, with
thousands of bombs deployed in North Sea area alone.
Depth Charging of U-boats
How many?
Depth charging of submarines during WWII
actually meant hunting down of German U-boats, either by air planes,
surface vessels or specially laid mine barrages. When the war started,
Germany had only 57 boats ready for service of which only 23 were fit
to operate in the Atlantic. In England it was reported that 15-18
German submarines could have been out at sea (NYT, 4 September 1939).
Although the number was small in the beginning and never more than a
dozen boats were in the Atlantic or on missions elsewhere at any time
during the first few months. The Royal Navy did not fear anything more
than the U-boats. Even with a modest success of sinking more than 100
ships with a tonnage of 100,000, the Allies felt the threat by U-boats
seriously and employed all means available at their command to fight
this enemy, whether real or imaginary. Consequently thousands of
charges could have been deployed day by day.
Care to be taken
The crews needed to be trained and familiarized in such exercises.
Following case involving a Russian Naval vessel might illustrate such a
situation: “(Russian) commanders of transport ships and torpedo
boats
were so much afraid of being attacked by a Finnish submarine in the
Gulf of Finland, that they set off depth charges every 15 minutes or
whenever an unconfirmed sighting of a periscope was reported, resulting
in a total of 400 depth charges having been dropped by end of operation
that day”, (Lit.: Van Dyke, p.54)[4].
Although other commanders might
have acted in a more restrained manner, one can easily imagine that a
large number of depth charges was being thrown over-board every day.
During the first 6 months of war, about 4,000 attacks against U-boats
are said to have taken place (Lit.: Hackmann)[5]. Every single attack
could have meant dozens of depth charges in action.
A seaman’s story?
There were a number of stories circulating about use of depth charges
in a variety of ways. Following is one example of such a story:
“It was rough. …we were investigating a U-boat off Jan
Mayen Island.
…the captain gave the order to fire. Eventually the after gun,
which
was in the gunner’s control, went independent firing and some
rounds
went away. But for us, who never had heard a shot fired in anger, the
noise was more frightening than the bombs… We carried out asdic
sweeps
on Sunday 13 October (1939) with the occasional depth-charge attacks
which provided us with plenty of fish, to the chef’s delight. On
Tuesday we were supposed to have been successful in destroying the
enemy….(In fact there was no ‘kill’.) (Lit.: Thomas,
p. 21)[6]
Attacking pattern
The following procedure could have been adopted in attacking U-boats:
|
“Once the presence of a submarine is
suspected,
the British
naval
procedures, so far as they were known before the war, prescribed for
attack by familiar methods such as an enclosing diamond pattern of
depth bombs, supplemented, of course, by shell fire and ramming if the
submarine could be forced to the surface. In the diamond-pattern
attack, the destroyer goes at full speed to the spot where the
submarine, slow and clumsy under water, was thought to be. One depth
bomb is let to go just before the spot is reached. A few seconds’
later
two more are lobbed out by a Y-gun, so that they land out on either
side of the destroyer’s wake. The fourth point of the diamond
pattern
attack is: another depth bomb to be dropped over the stern some
distance ahead of where the Y-gun had fired. In this way a large area
of the sea is covered in a diamond pattern. The effect is further
increased by bombs timed to go off at different levels, so that the
area is covered not only horizontally but vertically as well. The Area
covered by a bursting modern depth bomb is considerable”. (NYT,
16
September 1939).
|
Presuming that only 10 to 15 depth charges had been used during each
one of the 4,000 attacks as mentioned previously, it could be estimated
that 20,000 to 40,000 charges had been deployed under the sea surface
during the first war autumn. A standard depth charge could have a total
weight of 150 to 250 kg, with a charge of 50 to150 kg and an
operational depth of 200 metres under the sea surface.
The Germans started with a fleet of 57 U-boats of which nine were lost
due to various causes; two to mines, six to depth charges and one sunk
by a submarine. Above estimated figure about usage of 20,000 depth
charges during the first four months of war would mean deployment of
about 350 charges against each U-boat during a period of four months.
Vice versa, the Reichsmarine depth charged British submarines in the
North Sea and elsewhere. Dropping of one depth charge every two minutes
for a number of hours could have happened. (see below, Events: 5
October 1939).
Some Bombing Events in 1939
For references (Lit) see attached Literature list below
The aim of listing of following events is to give a brief illustration
of what happened in the first few months of WWII. The military
force unleashed was strong enough to change the weather conditions in
Northern Europe so much that the coldest winter for 110 years could
occur. Considerable number of aerial bombs released over sea,
together with other naval and military activities, like patrolling,
shelling, anti-aircraft fire, bombing, dropping of depth-charges, and
such other activities had turned the sea ‘up-side-down’.
This could
have significantly contributed to the emergence of arctic conditions
Bomber pilots had reported that they were ‘greeted’ with
fierce gunfire
salvoes when they reached enemy flotilla or coastline, which made it
difficult for them to practice a precise pointed bombing. From the
‘full picture’ only a few events and scenarios can be
mentioned here.
4 September 1939: The First RAF raid by about 30 planes in separate
groups targeted a fleet of Nazi naval vessels in the German Bight,
(Wilhelmshaven, and Brunsbuettel). One officer reported (NYT, 15
September 1939): “We were near the German coast when half a dozen
enemy
bombers came out to engage us. A game of hide and seek in the clouds
followed…. Conditions grew worse and there was heavy rain for an
hour…..(W)e made our land fall accurately and flew up the Elbe
estuary
until we sighted a number of naval vessels…..The enemy held his
fire
until we were almost over our targets. Then suddenly he opened every
gun he could bring to bear on us. (The pilot described) the
anti-air-craft fire ‘terrific’, especially from the larger
warships,
which seemed to carry seven anti-air-craft guns on either beam”.
About
seven RAF planes did not return to their home base.
The British air force attacked the German fleet at the North Sea
entrance to Kiel Canal (NYT, 5 September 1939); North Sea - 54
Blenheims and Wellingtons of RAF Bomber Command are deployed without
result against German warships sighted in the North Sea”. (Lit.:
Rohwer, Chronik).
8 September 1939: A concentrated bombing attack on the heavily
fortified German island of Sylt…. apparently was made today by,
what
one observer described, ten to fifteen planes. Anti-aircraft guns
boomed and explosions indicated that bombs were being dropped”.
(NYT, 9
September 1939).
27 September 1939;:“Nazi Planes Raid the British Fleet”;
(NYT, 28
September 1939). “Yesterday afternoon in the middle of the North
Sea a
squadron of British capital ships, together with an aircraft carrier,
cruiser and destroyers, were attacked by about twenty German aircraft.
No British ship was hit and no British casualties were incurred. One
German flying boat was shot down and another is reported to be badly
damaged”, (NYT, ditto). “This attack was made by fourteen
German land
bombers, it is said”, (NYT, 29 September 1939). “Last
Tuesday about
twenty German planes attacked a British North Sea Patrol”, (NYT,
8
October 1939).
29 September 1939: “ ..six British planes were reported by the
Germans
to have attacked a German naval squadron near Helgoland today”
(NYT, 30
September 1939). “Five out of 11 Hampdens (planes) are shot down
by
German fighters”, (Lit.: Rohwer, Chronik)
5 October 1939: “British submarine’s crew, bombed all day
at bottom of
the sea” (NYT, 6 October 1939). “In the first hour six
depth charges
sounded faintly and in the second hour the explosions, louder and
nearer, averaged one every two minutes”,(NYT, ditto).
9 October 1939; “British cruisers hunting submarines in the North
Sea
(southern coast of Norway) today fought off German bombers, which
attacked repeatedly. … The bombers attacked again and again
today, and
from the decks of the warships anti-aircraft guns blazed. “ (NYT,
10
October 1939). Also a German naval flotilla with more than a dozen
ships (Lit.: Rohwer); while the British employed 12 Wellington bombers,
the Germans sent almost 150 planes to the scene, without registering
any success (Lit.: Rohwer). “The entire attack, according to the
German
version, lasted two hours. The first German air fleet opened a heavy
attack from the east and the second followed from the northwest. The
number of planes have not been revealed, but the Germans have not
denied the British report that more than 100 bombs were dropped,
…”
(NYT, 13 October 1939).
10 October 1939; “Diving from a height of 5,000 feet and driven
off by
fierce anti-aircraft fire from multiple pompoms of a British cruiser
squadron, German bombers battled for more than an hour in the North Sea
yesterday until finally repulsed. ….In the first attack on the
British
fleet, it is said, the Germans used 500-pound and 1,000-pound
bombs….
Lieutenant Frank described the attack, declaring he dropped a
1,000-pound bomb on the carrier”. (NYT, 11 October 1939)
11 October 1939: “Since the war broke out, Sir Kingsley said, the
coastal command flew on reconnaissance, anti-submarine and patrol
convoys a distance of approximately 1 million miles and provided escort
for 100 convoys. Submarines were sighted by planes on seventy-two
occasions and thirty–four times the planes were able to attack,
he
said”. (NYT, 11 October 1939).
17 October 1939: “Nazi bomb naval base in Scotland”.
“About a dozen
German planes yesterday …rained bombs on British naval vessels
lying in
the Firth of Forth near Rosyth, Scotland, …(NYT, 17 October
1939).
Three ships are slightly damaged; two bombers are shot down (Lit.:
Rohwer, Chronik). “The first two planes were chased away (by
British
fighters) from 4,000 feet almost to the surface of the water and then
out to sea. Ten minutes later several British fighters ‘ganged
up’
against a bomber over Dalkeith and sent it crashing in flames at sea.
Another raider was destroyed fifteen minutes later; it also fell into
the sea.” (NYT, ditto).
18 October 1939: “In a brisk battle in which twelve unidentified
warplanes attacked six warships off the Netherlands island
Schiermannikoog, it was reported today”. “British and
German
planes battled again over the British naval base at Scapa Flow.”
(NYT,
19 October 1939). Four German planes attacked ships in Scapa Flow,
losing one plane. Training ship Iron Duke was damaged in the attack.
(Lit.: Rohwer, Chronik).
21 October 1939: Nine German bombers bound to attack a British convoy
off the Humber estuary are intercepted by fighter planes shooting down
four bombers. (Lit.: Rohwer, Chronik)
5 November 1939: Extract from a British eye witness account: “Our
outlook shouted, ‘Planes right ahead, Sir; three planes; they are
diving, Sir’. Then things happened awfully quickly. Our foremost
guns
opened fire, with a roar that drowned everything. The muzzles were
elevated almost level with the bridge and yellow flames sprang out,
obliterating the shapes of the German machines swooping over the
convoy. The sea leapt up in columns where their bombs were
dropped.”
(NYT, 5 November 1939)
7 November 1939: The first sorties by German torpedo-carrying
aircraft were flown against a British destroyer unsuccessfully, the
torpedo missed the target. (Lit.: Rohwer, Chronik)
14 November 1939: Nazi planes bomb Shetland Island. (NYT, 14 November
1939)
19 November 1939: A German minesweeper is badly damaged, and a total
loss due to depth bombs from another minesweeper off the island Sylt.
(Lit.: Rohwer, Chronik).
22 November 1939: Three Royal air force planes send a Dornier (bomber)
into the sea before it reaches coast. (NYT, 22 November 1939)
12 December 1939: Eight RAF Whitely bombers attack German
seaplane bases at Borkum and Sylt. (Lit.: Rohwer, Chronik).
14 December 1939: Twelve RAF bombers attack German warships in
Helgoland Bight, losing six. (Lit.: Rohwer, Chronik).
“British
Bombers and Messerschmitts fight; both sides lose planes in Helgoland
battle” (NYT, 15 December 1939). Nazi claim ten planes have been
shot
down. (NYT, 16 December 1939).
17 December 1939: German bomber planes attack trawlers off the English
east coast and sink 10 boats with ca. 3,000 tons. (Lit.: Rohwer,
Chronik)
18 December 1939: Driven away from the English coast, two German
bombers dived out of the clouds on the 487-ton British motor ship
Serenity today, riddled her decks with machine-gun fire and then
dropped 18 bombs until one struck her amidships and sent her to the
bottom. (NYT, 18 December 1939)
18 December 1939: Britons see German Raid: “Big bangs shook
my
house. I saw bursts of fire and clouds of smoke and flames from the
direction of the ships three or four miles away. There seemed to be
something burning on the water for a minute or two. It looked to me as
though something was blown up and went up in flames”. (NYT, 18
December
1939, p.12).
19 December 1939: ‘Air Fleets fight off Helgoland’.
‘34 down, say
Nazi’. “The biggest air battle of the war occurred
yesterday when
British bombers encountered German pursuit ships over Helgoland
Bight”
(NYT, 19 December 1939). The loss is 12 planes out of 24 RAF Wellington
bombers deployed. (Lit.: Rohwer, Chronik).
21 December 1939: “German aircrafts have attacked thirty-five
vessels,
including two neutral ships, in the last three days, the Admiralty
announced tonight. Of the ships attacked, one coasting steamer and six
fishing trawlers were listed as sunk.” (NYT, 21 December 1939)
Further reading: A detailed assessment of events is compiled about the
Russian invasion of Finland during December 1939 Russia–Finnish
war
(2_41), from which the following two
events are quoted:
13 January 1940: (Harold Denny reporting): One Soviet plane was
destroyed spectacularly over Helsinki in full view of people watching
from ground….the plane dived with its engine shot off to within
2,500
feet of the ground….We saw a flash of fire in the sky, blotted
out
immediately by a mushrooming blob of black smoke and then scraps of
debris began falling. A moment later we heard a roar. What had happened
apparently was that a Finnish anti-aircraft shell had hit the plane
squarely blowing it into pieces and exploding its load of bomb (NYT, 14
January 1940). 400 Soviet planes flew over Finland yesterday, dropping
500 bombs. (ditto)
13 January 1940: Gulf of Bothnia. A minesweeper and two patrol boats
dropped depth bombs in an attempt to cripple a Russian submarine, which
had trailed the small Finnish steamer, Bore 1, through the
international waters of the Gulf of Bothnia. (NYT, 14 January
1940)
Summary
Bombs and depth charges were not only employed at
random since
September 1, 1939. The weapons had been improved since WWI and their
ability to ‘deliver’ precisely had reached new dimensions
in warfare.
Presumably tens of thousands of massive explosions had mixed-up the sea
over a short period of time. Sea reacted swiftly by cooling out too
early for the forthcoming winter season and arctic air could penetrate
Northern Europe without facing resistance. Thus it can fairly be
concluded that war at sea had successfully modified the weather. Europe
was back in the Ice Age, (2_11).
LITERATURE:
Goulter, Christina J. M.; ‘A Forgotten
Offensive’,
London 1955.
Hackmann, Willem; ‘Seek and Strike – Sonar, anti-submarine
warfare and
the Royal Navy 1914-54’, London 1984.
Rohwer, Juergen and Huemmelchen, Gerhard; ‚Chronik des Seekrieges
1939-1945’ Oldenburg/Hamburg, 1968. The material is also
available in
German under: --www.wlb-stuttgart.de (Marine), Württembergische
Landesbibliothek, Stuttgart; and in English: Rohwer, Juergen and
Huemmelchen, Gerhard; ‚Chronology of the War at Sea,
1939-1945’ London,
1992.
Schmidt, Rudi; ‘Achtung – Torpedos los!’, 1991.
Thomas, David A.; ‘The Atlantic Star 1939-45’, London 1990.
Van Dyke, Carl; ‚The Soviet Invasion of Finland 1939-40’,
London, 1997.
|
[1]
|
Goulter, Christina J. M.;
‘A Forgotten Offensive’, London 1955.
|
|
[2]
|
Goulter, FN 1
|
|
[3]
|
Schmidt, Rudi; ‘Achtung –
Torpedos los!’, 1991.
|
|
[4]
|
Van Dyke, Carl; ‚The Soviet
Invasion of Finland 1939-40’, London,
1997.
|
|
[5]
|
Hackmann, Willem; ‘Seek
and Strike – Sonar, anti-submarine warfare
and the Royal Navy 1914-54’, London 1984.
|
|
[6]
|
Thomas, David A.; ‘The Atlantic
Star 1939-45’, London 1990.
|
|