Spitsbergen
warmth takes the North Atlantic
Climate Change
due to War at Sea - Impacts from 1918 to 1939
The Theme
– chain of proof
This paper aims at establishing
that the
war at sea from 1914-18 (5_13) was responsible for major climatic
change
events during the 1920s and 1930s, such as the Greening of Greenland,
Warming
of Europe and the Dust Bowl in the 1930s, etc. which attracted wider
interest.
Towards this purpose climate observation during the period in question
will be
analysed relating to significant changes, their timing, location, etc.
If a
closer link between the war at sea and any of these events can be
established,
it will lead to reliable evidential circumstances in support of the
cause.
In a detailed analysis close timely
interrelation between the military activities and Severe Warming at
Spitsbergen
has been established, (War at sea, 5_13),
and Sea mines (5_14). Following elaboration will establish
that the major climatic events in the
subsequent two decades had their origin in the 1918 event; (Spitsbergen
heats
up, (5_12). This discussion will be based on data
compiled in the next
section under: General Statements, Facts and Remarks, subdivided into
relevant
sea areas in the far north of the Atlantic.
It is widely acknowledged that the
regions
between Greenland and Iceland in the west and the Barents and Kara Seas
in the
east and lands surrounding them are the regions most sensitive (perhaps
in the
whole world) to climate changes, and that they respond very strongly to
either
warming or cooling (Lit.; Lamb, Arctic Ocean),.
The Norwegian Sea, due to its size, depth, and warm current may occupy
the
prime place among climate sensitive areas in the polar North Atlantic
(Sea
system effected, 4_12).
However, each of these regions has
an
individual climatic history during the period from 1918 to 1939.
Certain events
and aspects of a sea area can provide facts to the ‘chain of
proof’, that the
origin of climate change was in time and location close to WWI. This
shall be
done by brief statements concerning the -
1. North Atlantic region
relevant to the
severe warming, and for the
2. three climatic events
between 1918 and
1939,
based on material compiled below
under
section: General Statements, Facts and Remarks, to which the reader is
kindly
referred to.
Impact
on different sea areas
Spitsbergen had
been the centre of the ‘severe warming’ in 1918,
and remained the central area
for the accelerated warming trend through the 1920s and 1930s.
Even though Barents
Sea played a
major role in the warming-up process, it was clearly not the principal
cause It
reacted more like a follow up to what was happening further west, with
clear
indications that its influence increased after 1930 until 1939.
Greenland
experienced a brief warming period from the early 1920s to early 1930s
presumably initiated by warmer water that was diverted from Spitsbergen
Current
to ‘the left’, towards Greenland in 1918/19.
Greenland Sea: Although the data available from Jan
Mayen since 1922 indicate a
relatively stable situation of temperature values from 1922 to 1928, a
modest
rise occurred since the end of 1920s. During the 1930s mean winter
temperatures
had been temporarily significantly higher. This is analysed as follows:
a) The first period can be
regarded as
proof that the warming in 1918
and the following decade occurred primarily in the Eastern part of the
North
Atlantic, and that the brief warming of Greenland during the 1920s was
a
short-term ‘over-flow’ from the Spitsbergen Current
or the Norwegian Sea in
1918 and during the following few years.
b) varying levels of warming
during the
second period may have a
correlation with an increased influence of the Gulf Current since the
end of
the 1920s (see: Sub polar North Atlantic).
Sub polar North Atlantic had no impact on the severe warming at
Spitsbergen in 1918.
Available data seem to indicate that air and seawater temperature
remained on
an ‘average’ until the second half of the 1920s,
after which a continuous
warming trend set in, lasting until 1939. Whether the modest
temperature rise
alone would have had any significant impact and whether it would have
significantly influenced the continuous warming of the European North
Atlantic
is difficult to confirm. However, by 1928 the Gulf Current seems to
have flowed
more forcefully towards the North; see the following paragraph.
Norwegian Sea.
Very little information during the period 1918-1939 is available to
assess the actual impact during the post WWI period. Nevertheless, the
continuing temperature rise over the Northern European continent (e.g.
Norway), the Barents Sea and its continued stability at Spitsbergen,
should be related to the warming potential of the Norwegian Sea. By the
end of the 1920s the Gulf Current seems to have gained even more
influence.
This assumption
is based on the following facts:
a) A stronger inflow to the
Norwegian Sea
in 1928 is recorded (see:
section Norwegian Sea, Helland-Hansen; below).
b) Sea areas’
temperatures seem
to have got some ‘backing’ around 1930.
c) Warming of Europe continued
forcefully
through the 1930s with the
warmest winters in 1937/38 and 1938/39.
d) ‘Dust Bowl’ in
the
United States started in 1931 (see: below)
e) Winter of 1928/29 had been
extremely
cold in Europe, which might
have been caused by too warm water in the Norwegian Sea, (Late winter
1946-47 4_21).
It seems that the Norwegian Sea
presumably
experienced two sea water warming events, first in 1918, and the second
about
ten years later. One can only guess that the warming of air
temperatures at
Spitsbergen and Northern Europe during the 1930s could have been more
moderate
without the second event. .
Remark: The winter of 1928/29 had a
very
special meteorological feature, so did the even more extreme winter of
1946/47.
The latter is by date closely related to WWII. Although a time period
of ten
years had passed before winter 1928/29 occurred. After WWII it is less
than two
years. A correlation between WWI and WWII and the two extreme winters
should
not be prima facie ruled out. The huge and deep Norwegian Sea still
holds many
secrets. If one deep sea ‘bubble’ had taken shape
during WWI or WWII, it might
take a different time period to burst.
Three
major climatic events after WWI
The
‘Greening of Greenland’: The ‘Greening of
Greenland’ was remarkable because it was quite sudden and
significant enough for recognition. More important is the fact that the
warming was on a short-term basis only. This is regarded as a
supporting factor to the war at sea thesis. The war at sea
‘initiated’ a severe warming in Spitsbergen in 1918
in the waters of the North Atlantic. Its impact on the water body was
so massive, that a considerable part of the
‘transformed’ water at Spitsbergen took a westward
direction to Greenland. After a short period of time a warming along
the Greenland coast was observed and called the ‘Greening of
Greenland’. The effect of the warm water lasted only for a
short while. After one decade the warming had died away. That indicates
a sudden and mighty interference, like eruption of a volcano or an
earthquake. Nature reacts, but returns to its normal equilibrium after
a period of time. If the Severe Warming in 1918 was ‘war made
at sea’, then the Greening of Greenland was also of
anthropogenic making.
The Great
Plains ‘Dust
Bowl’: Recently scientists from
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Centre in
Greenbelt/USA*), found by computerized climate simulations that warm
water in
the tropical Atlantic initiated wind circulation that cut off the flow
of
moisture from subtropical waters to the Great Plains. The point
stressed by the
scientists is that the seawater temperatures played an important role
in this
matter even if warming or cooling occurred only for a fraction of a
degree. In
the early 1930s the jet stream over the Gulf of Mexico, weakened and
operated
further south, thereby excluding the Great Plains from the common
supply of
precipitation.
*)
NASA; www.nasa.gov/vision: Dust Bowl; Krishna Ramanujan
At the mid-latitude circulation the
temperature gradient between the equator and the poles determines the
location
of the subtropical jet stream. When the polar areas are warm, as in
summer
usually, the gradient lessens and the strength of the westerly airflow
diminishes.
Warming of the northern North
Atlantic
at
Spitsbergen, with serious climatic shift in 1918, and possibly, a much
smaller
one again in 1928, would inevitably affect the flow of the westerlies.
Although
the rain bringing jet stream to the Great Plains consists of low
flowing air,
the accelerated warming in the northern Atlantic may have played an
important
part in the long-term drought during the 1930s.
‘Warming of Europe’: Warming of Europe from the end of the
1910s to 1939 has been widely
acknowledged since the early 1930s. Source of the warming in 1918 was
the
European Atlantic waters: Norwegian Sea, Spitsbergen Current and the
Barents
Sea, presumably established and sustained by an internal process in the
Norwegian Sea, and /or supplied by a temporarily or long-term increased
inflow
of Gulf Current water at the end of the 1910s and 1920s.
The warming of Europe actually
started
most
markedly in Britain with a cooling during the WWI years from 1914-1918.
Responsibility of the war at sea for this cooling and
Britain’s three
successive snow winters between 1915 and 1918 has been explained in a
previous
chapter (Europe weather 1914-18,
5_11). More important is the considerable
circumstantial evidence that the Severe
Warming at Spitsbergen in 1918 was presumably the immediate result of
the war
at sea around Britain, and in the North, Baltic and Barents Sea.
Whether the
total European warming period from 1918 to 1939 was solely or partly
caused by
WWI is of secondary importance only, if a further more convincing cause
can be
named. The Severe Warming of 1918 was too serious and demands more than
just a
cursory interest.
General
Statements, Facts and Remarks
Spitsbergen
Substantial information on the
severe
warming in 1918 has been compiled in the paper: Spitsbergen
heats up (5_12).
Spitsbergen.
(data since 1912): Spitsbergen is of special interest as climatic
warming can
be particularly well observed there. The increase during winter is very
pronounced (Lit.: Kirch).
Brooks (Lit.:
1938)
At Spitsbergen the rise occurred in two
stages, the winters of 1922 till 1923 had been warm, those of 1925/26
to
1929/30 somewhat cooler, and those of 1930/31 onwards warmer than the
first
group.
Scherhag (Lit.:Polargebiet). At
Spitsbergen warming
up continued until WWII according to the following table:
Spitsbergen:
Deviation of mean monthly temperatures for the four winter months
December to March;
| 1918 – 19 = + 1.1 |
1925 – 26 = + 0.6 |
1932 – 33 = + 5.8 |
| 1919
– 20 = + 2.2 |
1926
– 27 = + 2.0 |
1933
– 34 = + 6.5 |
| 1920
– 21 = + 1.9 |
1927
– 28 = + 2.6 |
1934
– 35 = + 6.5 |
| 1921
– 22 = + 4.3 |
1928
– 29 = - 0.2 |
1935
– 36 = + 6.0 |
| 1922
– 23 = + 3.7 |
1929
– 30 = + 2.9 |
1936
– 37 = + 7.5 |
| 1923
– 24 = + 4.1 |
1930
– 31 = + 5.5 |
1937
– 38 = + 8.0 |
| 1924
– 25 =+ 5.3 |
1931
– 32 = +5.6 |
1938
–39 = (+ 7.1) |
Lamb
(Lit.;
Arctic, Figure 7.10),
provides a graphic account of the temperature difference between
1911-20 and
1921-30 with the centre east of Spitsbergen (+6°C). Lamb
indicates that this
region, together with the Norwegian Sea, seems to be the most sensitive
to
climatic variations.
Greenland Sea /
Greenland
Jan Mayen (data
since 1920): Warming is not so significant,
amounting to only 0.25°C during the period 1922/31 and 1930/39
(Lit.: Kirch)[6].
If means for the four winter months
December-March are analysed, only the winters of 1928/29, 1929/30,
1932/33, and
1938/39 saw increase in temperature of 1 to 1 ½°C.
Particularly the winter
seasons of 1921 to 1928 seem to have been quite
‘stable’, varying at the most
by 0.35°C. During the 1930s a modest rise occurred. Note: The
monthly mean
temperature data can be found in the work of Kirch (Lit.).
Myggbukta/East Greenland (data since 1922;
73°29’N, 21°34’W): According to
Kirch, the
station’s summer mean had shown a typical warming trend,
lasting until 1930/39
with a maximum of 3.29°C. Cooling started in 1931/40 (Lit.:
Kirch).
Analysing climate developments on
the
winter temperature data, one can see a warming trend since winter 1923
until
1933. Between 1933 and 1936 the previous gains (+7°C) were
lost. Winter
temperatures got +5°C warmer again since 1936 until winter
1938/39. Note: The
monthly mean temperature data can be found in the work of Kirch (Lit.).
Manley G.
(Lit.):
The last ‘bad ice year’ in the Greenland Sea was
1923.
Bjerknes J.
(Lit.: Atlantic):
The sea
surface temperatures near Greenland culminated in the early
1930s.
Carruther (Lit.:)
mentions that due to warmer water, cod fishing by Greenlanders,
increased
dramatically, from 500 to 1,000 tons in 1922-1925, to 8,000
in1925-1929 p.a., whereas the catch decreased to 6,000
tons in the year 1937. An excessively low temperature off East
Greenland’s
coast affects the survival of cod is confirmed by Nellen, W. (Lit.:),
showing in a graph that the production continued on the level of about
5-6,000
tons until 1948 but then accelerated ten-fold, but dropped almost to
zero in
the late 1980s.
Bjerknes, J. (Lit.: Atlantic)
analyses the warming in the 1920s as follows:
North of about
57° North the
trend in sea
temperature has been slightly upwards. Actually this change resulted
from a
brief but strong upward trend in the 1920s, which over compensated the
accumulated effect of a preceding long and slow downward trend. A
somewhat
similar brisk upward trend, starting as late as 1920, is found in the
Labrador
Current. ….The warming of the waters in the far northern
Atlantic (to which the
Pacific has no parallel) was much more sudden and short in range than
farther
south. Essentially, it lasted only from 1920 to 1930 in Greenland
waters and
from 1920 to early 1940s in Iceland and northern British waters.
Barents
Sea
Boar Island
(data since 1920): The recorded winters of 1920 and 1921
(January/February)
were significantly colder than the following, except 1928/29, until
winters of
1939/40 and 1940/41. In so far the warming started with winter of
1921/22. The
annual means are fairly equal (1 to 3.2°C, between 1920 and
1932), only getting
warmer after 1932.
The
winter means show a general rising
trend until 1939 since data are available. What is noticeable is a
considerable
‘unrest’ on a short-term basis, e.g. the
December/February means in winter of
1921/22 were -10°C, one year later it was
- 3°C. The cold winter of 1928/29 in Europe is fully reflected
in the
data record and quite obviously not related to the sea water conditions
in the
Norwegian/Barents Seas. Note: The monthly mean temperature data can be
found in
the work of Kirch (Lit.).
Vardo/Norway
(North Cape) (data since 1867): After a pronounced cooling during
1909/1918, a
strong increase with 0.8°C by 1913/22 occurred, which remained
constant until
1919/28. This was followed by a cooling by 0.5°C until 1923/32,
culminating in
a rapid warming in 1930/39 (Lit.: Kirch).
Taking the winter temperatures as
the
main
indicator of the start of a warming trend, at Vardo the warming only
started in
winter 1919/20 (December-March), being one degree warmer than the
previous
years, but also showing a clear warming trend in annual means. Note:
The
monthly mean temperature data can be found in the work of Kirch (Lit.).
Kelly, et al (Lit.):
The 1920s was a decade with strong warming in the Arctic regions. The
Barents
Sea and Kara Sea had warmed annually by 2°C by the mid-1920s,
and the Greenland
sector had warmed by a similar amount by the end of the 1920s. Warming
continued during the 1930s, but more pronounced in winter.
Schokalsky, J. (Lit.)
reported of a dramatic thinning of the upper layer (up to 100m), that
was less
salty and colder than the lower 600-800m layer of Atlantic water (high
salinity
and about two degrees warmer) between Franz Josef Land and Novaya
Zemlya, as
observed in 1928 and later on, with warming tendency.
Blacker (Lit.
p. 35)
indicates that south of Spitsbergen warm West Spitsbergen Current had
been kept
at bay by two cold currents, the Bear Island Current and the East
Spitsbergen Current
before 1930, and that the West Spitsbergen Current had had no influence
beyond
75°N.Blacker
continues: The West Spitsbergen
Current greatly increased in
volume so that it now covers most of the bank as far north as Isfjord,
and has
a marked influence even further north. A similar chain of events must
have
caused the disappearance of most Arctic species from the Bear Island
region.
Blacker concludes (p.37): Changes in the distribution of benthos in the
area
since about 1930 indicate that there has been a great increase in the
area of
the bottom over which Atlantic conditions are predominant, and a
corresponding
decline in the area influenced by Arctic conditions.
Hesselberg &
Johannessen (Lit.: Fig.2):
The rise in the temperatures at Isfjord is confirmed by the data from
Vardo
(North Cape). Also here the increase is especially rapid about the year
1920,
but the rise is more modest.
Blacker (Lit.)
reports: Russian scientists have recorded changes in the bottom fauna
of the
Murman coast and Kola Fjord with an increase of boreal species. When
compared
with the years 1900-06, these changes have been related with an
increase of
about 1°C in the mean bottom temperature of the Murman Current
for the period
1921-26.
Norwegian Sea
Helland-Hansen (Lit.:)
reports observations in a section crossing the Norwegian Atlantic
Current,
where a very marked change occurred in 1928, when temperatures and
salinity had
relatively higher values than previously observed. From May 1927 to May
1929
dynamic calculation showed an increase in the masses of ‘Gulf
Current’
streaming northwards to the Norwegian Sea of about 20%. The effect was
observed
in high latitudes after a couple of years.
Kushnir, Y. (Lit.):
From 1920 onward a basin wide warming
ensued, leading to warm anomalies after 1930 or so, depending on
latitude and
whether sea surface temperatures are examined. The increase is highest
in the
section 60-70°N (according Fig.2, p.144).
Manley G. (Lit.: Fig.4): Rise in winter temperature
means in
Norway started
after winter 1918/19 with 1-2°C during the next two decades.
Atlantic
– South of Iceland – West of England
Bjerknes J. (Lit.: Atlantic):Maximum
sea surface temperatures occurred from Iceland to England in the
early 1940s.
Bjerknes, J. (Lit.: Fluctuation):
While investigating sea surface temperature (SST) conditions between
Iceland
and the Azores (time series of annual sea temperatures from 1850-1960),
he
states: ‘the sea temperature at the centre goes through the
maximum a little
after 1890, the minimum a little after 1920, and again the maximum
after 1940
(for 61.5°N). Actually, the ‘time series’
mentioned by Bjerknes (ditto, Fig.5)
indicate a modest rise in SST since about 1926 until the second half of
the
1930s.
Deser et.al. (Lit. p.1749):
A dominant mode of variation in the
winter
time surface climate over the North Atlantic during this century is
associated
with the global surface warming trend during the 1920s and 1930s. It
tempts to
speculate that observed climate trends over the North Atlantic during
the 1920s
and 1930s were due to intensification of the thermohaline circulation
(ditto,
p.1752).
The pattern
of change in sea surface temperatures and air temperature between
1900-29 and
1939-68 (or equivalent, the trend during 1917-39) indicate that the
warming was
concentrated along the Gulf Stream east of Cape Hatteras. Warming also
occurred
over the Greenland Sea and the eastern subtropical Atlantic.
Eythorsson, J. (Lit.,):
Iceland air and sea temperatures had been
rising for over two decades since the 1920s, the rise most pronounced
during
the winter months (Fig.1 and 5).
Rodewald, M. (Lit.: Bemerkungen)
published in 1948 the deviation of water temperatures at South Iceland
from
1895-1939. These figures provide the strong indication that the warming
of the
ocean at Iceland started only in 1926, which can be regarded as proof
that the
warm seawater that initiated the warming at Spitsbergen needed about
six years
to reach Iceland. Due to the significance of these data the record from
1895 to
1939 is reproduced as follows:
Slevogsbank
(South Iceland) 63°N, 21°W, sea water temperature
differences 1895 -1939
1895, +0.84
1896, +0.24
1897, +0.19
1898, -0.16
1899, -0.03
1900, -0.02
1901, +0.28
1902, +0.20
1903, -0.10
1904, +0.43
1905, -0.23 |
1906, -0.27
1907, -0.56
1908, +0.21
1909, +0.37
1910, +0.35
1911, -0.19
1912, +0.08
1913, -0.28
1914, -0.63
1915, -0.45
1916, -0.05 |
1917, -0.16
1918, -0.05
1919, -0.42
1920, -0.39
1921, -1.07
1922, -0.65
1923, -0.62
1924, -0.08
1925, -0.14
1926, +0.22
1927, +0.14 |
1928, +0.93
1929, +0.43
1930, +0.12
1931, +0.14
1932, +0.39
1933, +0.66
1934, +0.54
1935, +0,47
1936, +0,54
1937, +0,47
1938, +0,73 |
1939, +1,10
|
During the time before and after
1926
there
was roughly a jump in seawater temperatures of more than one-half
degree. This
was a very significant change that might have been getting some support
from
the warming of the north of the North Atlantic, commencing at
Spitsbergen in
1918, that reached Greenland in the early 1920s and arrived in Iceland
in 1926.
However, warming of the Irminger Current would, in principle, have been
caused
by the Gulf Current.
Rodewald, M. (Lit., Golfstrom)
provides sea water temperatures, all showing an increasing tendency
since 1919
in respect of three sea areas in the East Atlantic, as follows:
| Sea Area |
Ca. Position |
1906 -1913 |
1919 -1939 |
Shift in °C |
| Irminger
Current |
63N, 10-20W |
|
Strong
increase |
+ 2.5
°C |
| West of
Scotland |
57N, 15W |
Strong
varying |
increase |
+ 1.0
°C |
| West of
Scotland |
57N, 15W |
Strong
varying |
increase |
+ 1.0
°C |
Lumby J. R.
(Lit., p.10):
In the
south-west of Ireland (ca. 100 km), it is evident that until about 1927
temperature conditions at 200 m remained more or less static, but after
that an
increase took place, which, so far as may be judged from the somewhat
scanty
observations, has in recent years reached an amount of
¾°C.
Brown, P. R. (Lit.):
Mean annual air temperature for the area around 51°N
12°W (ca. 200 km west of
south-west Ireland) during the period1880-1960, shows little average
trend over
the whole period, although it does show a marked warming trend from
1922-1939.
Mean annual sea temperatures also show this rising tendency from 1922
to 1939
and also there was a small average rising tendency for the sea
temperature over
the whole period.
LITERATURE:
Bjerknes, J. (Atlantic); ‚The
Recent
Warming of the North Atlantic’,; in: Bolin, Bert,
‚The Atmosphere and Sea in
Motion’, Oxford 1959, pp 65ff.
Bjerknes. J. (Fluctuation);
‘Climate
Fluctuation over the oceans and in the tropical Atlantic’,
in: Change of
Climate; Proc. of the Rome Symposium, UNESCO/WMO, 1963, pp. 297-319.
Blacker, R.W.; Benthic Animals as
indicator
of Hydrographic conditions and climate change in Svalbard
waters’, in: Fishery
Investigation of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and food; Vol.
XX, No.
10, London, 1957, p.1.
Brown, P.R.; ‘Climate
Fluctuation over the
oceans and in the tropical Atlantic’, in: Change of Climate;
Proc. of the Rome
Symposium, UNESCO/WMO, 1963, pp.109-117.
Brooks, C.E.P.; ‘The Warming
Artic’, in: The
Meteorological Magazine, Vol. 73, March 1938, pp. 29-31.
Carruthers, J.N.; ‘Some
interrelationships
of Meteorology and Oceanography’, in: Quarterly Journal
of the Royal Met. Soc., Vol.67, No.291, July
1941, pp. 207-230.
Deser, Clara, and Maurice L.
Blackmon;
‘Surface climate variations over the North Atlantic Ocean
during winter:
1900-1989’, in: Journal on Climate, September 1993, pp.
1743-1753.
Eythorsson, J.;
‘Temperature variations in Iceland’, in:
Geographiska Annaler,
Bd.XXXI, 1949, pp. 36-55.
Helland-Hansen, B.; ‘Remarks
on some variations in atmosphere and
sea’, in: ?, year ?, pp. 75-82.
Hesselberg, Th. and Johannessen, T.
Werner;
in: Sutcliffe, ed.; ‘Polar Atmosphere Symposium –
Part I, Meteorology Section;
Symposium at Oslo 2-8 July 1956’, London 1958, pp. 18ff.
Kelly, P.M. et.al. (Jones, Sear,
Cherry
and
Tavakol); ‘Variations in Surface Air Temperatures: Part 2.
Artic Region,
1818-1980’; in: Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 110, February
1982, pp. 71-83.
Kirch, Regina;
Temperaturverhaeltnise in der Arktis waehredn der letzten 50
Jahre’, in:
Meteorologische Abhandlungen, Bd.LXIX Heft 3, Berlin 1966, p. 22.
Knies, Jochen;
‚Die
Bedeutung des noerdlichen Auslaeufers des Golfstroms fuer unser Klima:
Der
Westspitzzbergenstrom’, in: DGM-Mitteilingen 2/1996, p.32f.
Kushnir, Yochanan;
‘Inter-decadal
variations in North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature and associated
atmospheric
conditions’, Journal of Climate, Vol.7, January 1994, pp.
141-157.
Lamb, H.H. (Arctic Ocean);
‘The Climatic
Environment of the Artic Ocean’; in: Louis Rey (ed), The
Arctic Ocean, London
1982, pp. 135-161.
Lumby, J.R.; The Depth of the
wind-produced
homogeneous layer in the oceans’, Fishery Investigations,
Ministry of
Agriculture, Fishery and Food, Series II, Vol. XX, No.2, London 1955.
Manley, Gordon; ‚Some recent
contributions
to the study of climatic change’, in: Quarterly Journal of
Met.Soc., Vol. 73,
1944, pp. 197-219. (reference
to
H.W.Ahlmann; Den nutida klimafluktuationen, Yerm, 61, 1941, pp.11-24).
Nellen, Walter;
‚Klima
und Fischerei’, DGM-Mitteilungen 4/1995, p. 11f.
Rodewald, M.;
‚Bemerkungen – zu M. Rodewald ‚Golfstrom
und Wetter’, 1948’; in: Annalen der
Meteorologie, Juli/Ausgust 1948, p. 250.
Rodewald, M.;
‚ Golfstrom
und Wetter’, in: Annnalen der Meteorologie, 1.Jahrg., Heft 3,
1948, pp.65-69.
Scherhag,
R.(Polargebiet); ‚Die Erwaermung des Polargebiets’,
in: Annalen der
Hydrography, Jg. LXVII,
1939, pp.57-67.
Schokalsky, J.; ‚Recent
Russian researches
in the Arctic Sea and the mountains of Central Asia’, in: The
Scottish
Geographical Magazine, Vol. 52, No.2, March 1936, pp. 73-84.
Brown, P.R.; ‘Climate
Fluctuation over the oceans and in the
tropical Atlantic’, in: Change of Climate; Proc. of the Rome
Symposium,
UNESCO/WMO, 1963, pp.109-117.
|